Skip to content

RaceWorth™

RacesUtah Wasatch

Destination100MLottery

Bear 100

Demand

4 out of 5

How much it asks

Worth

4 out of 5

Whether the ticket is worth it

Logan, Utah to Garden City, Utah, United States

Logan Canyon in the Bear River Mountains
Logan Canyon in the Bear River Mountains Paul Hermans / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Scorecard · is it worth it?

Worth the trip if the mountains match what you want.

The card

Bear is the Utah 100 that still sounds like a mountain club and still publishes like one. The official sheet: 100 miles through the Bear River Range, 20,321 feet of climb, high point 8,865, start in Logan, finish near Bear Lake. For 2026 the finish is Garden City. Demand is 4 because that is a long point-to-point with real climbing, rocky descents, and a night that often goes below freezing. It is not 5 because the altitude is not Colorado-thin and the technicality is mixed trail, not off-trail San Juan.

Worth is 4. Fall aspen and maple are a reason to fly if you like that range in late September. The race is explicit about not being UTMB-owned while still submitting results for Index hunters. Qualifiers and a lottery are the gate, which is ordinary for a Western 100 and healthier than a stones economy. Organization confidence is medium: bear100.com is specific.

If you want the harder Utah 100, Wasatch is the demand 5. If you want the prettier autumn 100, Bear is the worth conversation. Neither one is Speedgoat.

The official site lists a qualifier and a lottery, which is ordinary Western 100 friction, and it also bothers to say the race is not UTMB-owned. That sentence is why this card exists next to Speedgoat. Logan to Garden City in 2026 is a point-to-point with a lake at the end, not a loop you can forget. Fall color is the scenery product; freezing nights are the climate product. We are not inventing a date or a fee band. bear100.com remains the source. If you cannot get into Wasatch and you still want Utah mountains in September, this is the destination 100. If you wanted 24,000 feet of gain, you wanted Wasatch.

Who it is for

Runners who want a Western mountain 100 in fall colors, with a qualifier culture and no UTMB ownership.

Who should skip

Anyone who needs 13,000-foot drama. Bear is mountains; it is not the San Juans.

Elevation

ft5,0006,0007,0008,0009,000Start (Hyrum Gibbons Mount Logan Park) · 0.0 mi · cutoff 0 hLogan Peak · 10 mi · cutoff 4 hLeatham Hollow · 20 mi · cutoff 7 hUpper Richards Hollow · 28.5 mi · cutoff 10.5 hRight Hand Fork (RHF) · 37.5 mi · cutoff 13.5 hTemple Fork · 45.5 mi · cutoff 16.5 hTony Grove · 52 mi · cutoff 19 hFranklin Basin · 62 mi · cutoff 23.5 hLogan River · 70.5 mi · cutoff 27 hBeaver Mountain · 76.5 mi · cutoff 29 hPeter Sinks · 83.5 mi · cutoff 31.5 hBurnt Fork · 92 mi · cutoff 34.25 hFinish (Garden City, Conestoga Ranch) · 100 mi · cutoff 36 h

Tap or hover for miles, clock, and aidft

Dark from 19:19 to 07:17 local. No split grid; shading uses start time and clock only.

Bottom ticks are aid. Longest gap 10.0 mi.

Course line from official GPX. Dots are aid. Tap or hover for mile, elevation, and clock.

Hardest stretch

Hardest stretch: Start (Hyrum Gibbons Mount Logan Park) to Logan Peak, 4,523 ft in 10 mi.

Segment gains from the course elev profile.

FromToMiGainLoss
Start (Hyrum Gibbons Mount Logan Park)Logan Peak1016.1 km4,523 ft1,379 m569 ft173 m
Logan PeakLeatham Hollow1016.1 km352 ft107 m3,972 ft1,211 m
Leatham HollowUpper Richards Hollow8.513.7 km2,309 ft704 m76 ft23 m
Upper Richards HollowRight Hand Fork (RHF)9.014.5 km863 ft263 m2,663 ft812 m
Right Hand Fork (RHF)Temple Fork8.012.9 km1,138 ft347 m865 ft264 m
Temple ForkTony Grove6.510.5 km2,679 ft817 m480 ft146 m
Tony GroveFranklin Basin1016.1 km722 ft220 m2,129 ft649 m
Franklin BasinLogan River8.513.7 km2,038 ft621 m1,465 ft447 m
Logan RiverBeaver Mountain6.09.7 km1,160 ft354 m1,341 ft409 m
Beaver MountainPeter Sinks7.011.3 km1,512 ft461 m340 ft104 m
Peter SinksBurnt Fork8.513.7 km1,300 ft396 m1,746 ft532 m
Burnt ForkFinish (Garden City, Conestoga Ranch)8.012.9 km45 ft14 m1,864 ft568 m
Start
4,849 ft1,478 m
Finish
5,980 ft1,823 m
Net
+1,131 ft+345 m
Longest climb
3,331 ft1,015 m

Point to point. Net uphill. Total climb is still in Facts.

Weekend

Official handbook facts

Start
06:00
Pacer from
38 mi
Kit
Not required · No mandatory gear list.
Tracker
Open

Printable cutoff card

Bear 100 2026 information / start time · retrieved 2026-09-06 (repo record)

Field

Last editions · 100M scored distance

Field evidence: who showed up, who finished, how long. DNF is that evidence, not a difficulty score. Public results, scored distance only.

DNF over the years

202333%202428%202525%

DNF 25% in 2025, 28% the year before.

2025

Starters
335
Finishers
252
DNF
25%
Win
18:34:50
Median
31:15:07
retrieved 2026-09-06 (repo record)

2024

Starters
348
Finishers
251
DNF
28%
Win
19:55:23
Median
29:59:01
retrieved 2026-09-06 (repo record)

2023

Starters
356
Finishers
239
DNF
33%
Win
17:11:51
Median
30:36:28
retrieved 2026-09-06 (repo record)

2022

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
235
DNF
–
Win
20:14:15
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2021

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
199
DNF
–
Win
18:45:57
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2020

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
207
DNF
–
Win
18:38:52
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2019

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
204
DNF
–
Win
19:06:00
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2018

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
221
DNF
–
Win
19:53:10
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2017

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
222
DNF
–
Win
18:28:48
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2016

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
166
DNF
–
Win
19:33:30
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2015

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
207
DNF
–
Win
19:01:07
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2014

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
166
DNF
–
Win
18:59:24
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2013

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
174
DNF
–
Win
17:56:03
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2012

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
167
DNF
–
Win
17:50:15
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2011

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
175
DNF
–
Win
20:55:00
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2010

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
122
DNF
–
Win
18:34:09
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2009

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
95
DNF
–
Win
18:43:37
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2008

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
53
DNF
–
Win
19:59:07
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2007

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
62
DNF
–
Win
18:50:45
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2006

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
36
DNF
–
Win
18:35:00
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2005

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
36
DNF
–
Win
20:01:35
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2004

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
41
DNF
–
Win
22:00:13
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2003

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
42
DNF
–
Win
19:51:11
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2002

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
32
DNF
–
Win
21:00:17
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2001

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
17
DNF
–
Win
21:49:26
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

2000

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
9
DNF
–
Win
23:29:00
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

1999

Finishers from UltraRunning Magazine calendar results table (100 Miles). Starters/DNF not published on this page.

Starters
.
Finishers
14
DNF
–
Win
25:04:04
Median
.
retrieved 2026-09-07

Overall field only. Not a pro or sponsored subset.

Climate

Typical September at the start area · historical race-week weather

Typical high
79°F (26°C)
Typical low
49°F (10°C)
Typical precip
1.3 in (34 mm) / September
Days with rain
18% of days
High point
8,865 ft (2,702 m)

2015–2024 September means at the start / massif. · Open-Meteo ERA5 / climate · retrieved 2026-09-06 (repo record)

Dimensions

Ten 1–5 scores with a one-line why. Organization has a separate confidence tag.

Supporting dimensions · organization confidence medium

Distance & format
How much does the advertised distance and format actually ask?
4 out of 5

Point-to-point 100, Logan toward Bear Lake. A mountain 100 with a qualifier and lottery.

Vertical
How serious is the climbing, not just the mile marker?
4 out of 5

Official 20,321 ft of climb. Serious, not Wasatch's 24k.

Technicality
Hands, poles, route-finding, or just a long dirt road?
3 out of 5

Mixed: long climbs, some rocky descents, more trail than scramble.

Climate
Heat, monsoon, ice, or a friendly summer afternoon?
4 out of 5

Late September: fall color, freezing nights, warm days. The swing is the weather.

Altitude
Does the air change the race, or is it a talking point?
3 out of 5

High point 8,865 ft. Real, not the Colorado air problem.

Logistics
How hard is the weekend around the race: travel, crew, lodging, rules?
3 out of 5

Logan start, 2026 finish in Garden City. Crewable, not a three-country circus.

Prestige & field
Does the start list and history change what the weekend feels like?
3 out of 5

Respected Western 100, not an icon. The field is mountain-serious.

Organization
From public evidence, does the event look competently run?
4 out of 5

Public qualifier rules, explicit not-UTMB stance. Medium-high from the public record.

Value
Entry fee, travel tax, and lottery friction versus what you get on course.
4 out of 5

A mountain 100 with a lottery, not a stones tax.

Adventure & scenery
Would you fly for the place even if nobody kept score?
4 out of 5

Aspen, maple, Bear River Range. Fall is the scenery product.